SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.26 issue2Deafness and prejudice: reviewing the scientific productionThe letter and the writing are not to be read author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

article

Indicators

Share


Psicologia em Revista

Print version ISSN 1677-1168

Abstract

FONTES, Flávio Fernandes  and  SALES, André Luis Leite de Figueirêdo. What is the epistemological place of psychoanalysis?. Psicol. rev. (Belo Horizonte) [online]. 2020, vol.26, n.2, pp.760-775. ISSN 1677-1168.  https://doi.org/10.5752/P.1678-9563.2020v26n2p760-775.

An epistemological position is analyzed and named as Theory of the Absolute Epistemological Uniqueness of Psychoanalysis (TAEUP). It consists of the idea that psychoanalysis is not a species of any genre – it is not science, not philosophy, not art, etc. There are different reasons to justify TAEUP: 1) the discovery of a new object in the history of knowledge: the unconscious; 2) the invention of a new method: free association; 3) the invention of a new method of knowledge production: metapsychology. We carry out a critical examination of these arguments, from the perspective of Critical Freud Studies, concluding that none of the above reasons is enough to claim TAEUP. In light of a critical Freudian studies perspective, through a critical exam of these justifications, it can be concluded that none of the above reasons is sustained. Finally, we propose a different picture: psychoanalysis should not be conceived as a genderless species, but as a species belonging to several genres.

Keywords : Critical Freud studies; Epistemology; Criticism.

        · abstract in Portuguese | Spanish     · text in Portuguese     · Portuguese ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License