SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue39Sophie's choicePossibility of psychoanalysis in psychological emergency attendance service: a place of subjective rectification author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

article

Indicators

Share


Stylus (Rio de Janeiro)

Print version ISSN 1676-157X

Abstract

FARIA, Juliana Sperandio. The out-body: impasses between holophrase and letter. Stylus (Rio J.) [online]. 2019, n.39, pp.135-146. ISSN 1676-157X.

The differences between the psychosomatic phenomenon and the symptom are clarified in the psychoanalysis clinic by the holophrase concept, as Lacan presented during his 11th Seminar. However, the holophrase was already an announcement of a symbolic rupture, given that it appears as a real signifier, or as an S1 out of the chain. This is the reason why we can call a holophrase an out-body referring to the "symbolic body". The real problem was established in the decade of 1970, when Lacan defines the symptom as a letter, a mark of the One, which is out-body. Thus, the question is: holophrase, is that a letter? What kind of "body" was Lacan talking about? The development in the Lacanian theory related to the concepts of the body, the unconscious and the symptom imply a study about what the effects in the body between those two are.

Keywords : Letter; Holophrase; Symptom; Body; Unconscious.

        · abstract in Portuguese | Spanish | French     · text in Portuguese     · Portuguese ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License