DAMASCENO, Maurício Henriques. A noção de não-consciente dos filósofos e o inconsciente freudiano. []. , 5, 1, pp.174-189. ISSN 1518-6148.

The text that follows isn't claiming a new discussion about Psycho-analysis and Philosophy. What it suggests is a systematic reading in which something can be understood about a debate that lasts since the beginning of the Twentieth Century. Because it's about a convergency with a vaste complexity and dispersion, we chose to summarize the matter's presentation, in order to achieve our goals. Therefore, the debate will start from a modern context without, nevertheless, sparing the preceding philosophy's evolution. This last one will have a subliminar state, being present in a concealing way. Concerning the fact that it's a complex convergency and relatively dispersive, is necessary to enlighten some reasons. Complex because it's an interdisciplinar space, so, it demands some knowledge about the two subjects envolved. Dispersive because neither Psycho-analysis nor Philosophy end in a definite theoric group capable of asserting a consent. These two points (complexity and diversity) accord to this proposal an introdutionary feature which justifies our generalized approach, interested in an extensive problematic delimitation without privileging neither a philosophical nor a psycho-analysis reading. With this purpose, the text will start at the no conscious inkling, present in the Plotinus' philosophy, going shortly through the rationalists Pierre Nicole and Espinoza, ending in the Modern Philosophy of Kant and Schoepehauer. During this first part will be used, as a main reference, the book O Sono Dogmático de Freud produced by Pierre Raikovic. The second part regards the construction of Freud's concept, using as a reference the metapsychological article O Inconsciente from 1915.

: Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; unconscious; non-conscious; conscience.

        · |     · |     · ( pdf )