Serviços Personalizados
Journal
artigo
Indicadores
Compartilhar
Journal of Human Growth and Development
versão impressa ISSN 0104-1282versão On-line ISSN 2175-3598
J. Hum. Growth Dev. vol.30 no.3 São Paulo set./dez. 2020
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.v30.11102
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Maternal perception of the child's nutritional status from the perspective of adjusted residual analysis
Percepção materna do estado nutricional do filho sob a óptica da análise dos resíduos ajustados
Gustavo Carreiro PinascoI, III; Arthur Brunelli SalesI; Carla Venância Aguilar SantosI; Elizandra ColaII; Fabiano Novaes Barcellos FilhoI; João Batista Francalino da RochaIII; Eduardo Moreno Júdice de Mattos FarinaI; Willer França FiorottiI; Luiz Carlos de AbreuI, III
IEscola Superior de Ciências da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Vitória - EMESCAM Av. Nossa Sra. Da Penha, 2190 - Bela Vista, Vitória - ES, 29017-502, Brazil
IIHospital Estadual Infantil Nossa Senhora da Glória - HEINSG Alameda, 205 - Santa Lúcia, Vitória - ES, 29055-120, Brazil
IIICentro Univeristário Saúde ABC - FMABC Av. Lauro Gomes, 2000 - Vila Sacadura Cabral, Santo André - SP, 09060-870, Brazil
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUNG: The maternal perception of the nutritional status of their children has several important social factors in its composition and it can be important in determine quality of children's food
OBJECTIVE: To assess social factors influencing maternal perception of her children´s nutritional status
METHODS: Cross sectional study with school children from 6 to 10 years from a public school in São Paulo, Brazil. The data was obtained through a structured questionnaire applied to mothers and through children's body mass index. Associations between variables were analyzed by the Qui-square test and by the adjusted residues analysis, with 5% of significance. The agreement between maternal perception and nutritional status was assessed through the Kappa test
RESULTS: We found incorrect perception in 45.8% of cases, from which 98.2% were underestimation, with 80% of underestimation for overweight children. We found poor and slight agreement for all cases. Adjusted residuals pointed eutrophic underestimation; better maternal perception for the obese; better perception for mothers that attained middle and high school levels; underestimation for eutrophic boys and correct perception for eutrophic girls. Single mothers and those who do not work outside tended to underestimate their eutrophic children
CONCLUSION: We found poor agreement for almost all cases, with exception to mothers of girls and those that do not work outside. A correct perception was related positively with lower education levels, being worse for mothers without a partner and for those who do not work outside. Mothers of girls, compared to mothers of boys, had a more accurate perception
Keywords: maternal behavior, nutritional status, child; overweight, obesity.
RESUMO
INTRODUÇÃO: A percepção materna do estado nutricional de seus filhos apresenta diversos fatores sociais importantes em sua composição e ela pode ser um importante na determinação da qualidade de alimentação das crianças
OBJETIVO: Avaliar os fatores sociais que influenciam a percepção materna sobre o estado nutricional de seus filhos
MÉTODO: Estudo transversal com escolares de 6 a 10 anos de uma escola pública de São Paulo, Brasil. Os dados foram obtidos por meio de um questionário estruturado aplicado às mães e a partir de antropometria das crianças. As associações entre as variáveis foram analisadas pelo teste do Qui-quadrado e pela análise dos resíduos ajustados, com 5% de significância. A concordância entre a percepção materna e o estado nutricional foi avaliada por meio do teste Kappa
RESULTADOS: Encontramos percepção incorreta em 45,8% dos casos, dos quais 98,2% foram de subestimação, com 80% de subestimação para crianças com sobrepeso. Encontramos concordância pobre e leve para todos os casos. Os resíduos ajustados apontaram para subestimação eutrófica; melhor percepção materna para o obeso; melhor percepção para mães que atingiram o ensino fundamental e médio; subestimação para meninos eutróficos e percepção correta para meninas eutróficas. As mães solteiras e as que não trabalham fora tendem a subestimar seus filhos eutróficos
CONCLUSÃO: Encontramos baixa concordância para quase todos os casos, com exceção das mães de meninas e das que não trabalham fora. A percepção correta relacionou-se positivamente com a menor escolaridade, sendo pior para as mães sem companheiro e que não trabalham fora. As mães de meninas, em comparação com as mães de meninos, tiveram uma percepção mais precisa
Palavras chave: comportamento materno, estado nutricional, criança, sobrepeso, obesidade.
Authors summary
Why was this study done?
Maternal perception of a child's nutritional status is a determining factor in the care to be taken with their children. It can significantly influence children's food both qualitatively and quantitatively. Understanding the factors associated with the variation in mothers' perception of their children's nutritional status can be an important key for public health decision making in nutrition.
What did the researchers do and find?
We applied a questionnaire, with questions asked based on the current literature, on parents of children between six and ten years old from a public school in the city of São Paulo, and compared the answers with the objective anthropometric assessment of this population of students. Mothers with low schooling and children with obesity tend to perceive the nutritional status correctly, while single mothers, who work outside the home and with male children tend to make more mistakes when perceiving the nutritional status of their children.
What do these findings mean?
The application of the statistical analysis of adjusted residuals allowed a better interpretation of social factors associated with the maternal perception of the nutritional status of their children. Factors such as children with obesity and low maternal education, which classically have been related to a worse perception of mothers, were more associated with better levels of assertiveness. Mothers who need to spend more time away from home, such as those who work outside the home and who do not have a partner, tend to commit more mistakes in the perception of their children's nutritional status.
INTRODUCTION
Maternal perception of their child's nutritional status is substantial since it determines standards of care that defines mother's eating habits and practices with their children, as well as the future personal eating habits of these children. Recent studies1 show that the prevalence of overweight among children in Latin America has been increasing. It is known that obesity in childhood is directly associated with the persistence of this condition in adulthood, determining a higher occurrence of comorbidities, such as hypertension, diabetes, and cardiovascular problems1.
Incorrect feeding is a determining factor in the prevalence of obesity at any age2, with the highest occurrence of children's eating errors being a factor associated with mistaken maternal perception, which is a factor associated with greater difficulty in implementing diets for children who are improperly fed3. A systematic review4 on the topic found that mothers have difficulty in correctly assessing their children's nutritional status. In this context, adequate maternal perception is a fundamental factor in coping, especially with childhood obesity, as this allows for better maternal adherence in dietary interventions3.
The parent's mistakes can be related to different factors5, such as maternal education level4, marital status, parents' work routine6 and the child's sex7. Their understanding of the nutritional status is a decisive tool for making preventive actions to combat childhood obesity8.
This study aims to assess the influence of social factors related to the maternal perception (MP) of their child's nutritional status (NS).
METHODS
We performed a cross-sectional study with convenience sampling of children from 6 to 10 years old, students of a federal elementary public school in the city of São Paulo. The school is dedicated to educating the children of hospital staff at the Federal University of São Paulo, in which the authors worked and, therefore, was chosen for the study.
Data were collected from a structured questionnaire based on a previous national study9, applied personally to mothers in a school parents' meeting, trying to cover all students. In case of abstention, the document was sent for individual filling. In the questionnaire, the following variables were assessed: age and sex of the child, education, marital status, the mother's work routine and the perception of her child's NS.
Of the 235 questionnaires that were applied, 122 returned fully completed and four were excluded because they were incomplete, totaling a sample of 118 individuals.
An informed consent form was sent to all mothers. After authorization, the children were weighed and measured in a single moment by two pediatricians with experience in anthropometry, who measured each child individually. When weighing, a stable platform scale, from the Filizola brand, was used, with a precision of 5g. Height was measured using a fixed stadiometer with a precision of 0.1 cm. The children were barefoot and wore light clothing, suitable for the procedure.
Maternal age, weight, height and body mass index (BMI) of the child were the variables expressed by measures of central tendency (mean and standard deviation). The variables of the child's sex, mother's work routine, marital status and education were expressed in absolute and relative frequencies. Children were also nutritionally classified according to the BMI value (kg / m2) and divided into four categories, according to the World Health Organization: thinness (p1≤BMI <p3), eutrophy (p3≤BMI≤p85), overweight (p85 <BMI≤p97) and obesity that included children with obesity or severe obesity (BMI> p97). A fifth category called excessive weight was considered, formed by the classifications of overweight and obesity (BMI> p85).
The maternal perception of the children's NS was shown in frequency tables, in relation to the total sample, the child's sex, and the mothers' education, marital status and work routine (tables 1 to 4, respectively). The variables BMI and maternal perception were analyzed using the Chi-square test (𝝌2), at a significance level of 5%, in relation to the total sample, the child's sex and the mothers' education, marital status and work routine. The respective p-values obtained were displayed in tables 1 to 4. In cases of significant association, the data had its residuals calculated and adjusted.
The adjusted residual (AR) analysis can be used as an aid in the interpretation of data organized in contingency tables. Through it, it is possible to evaluate how the different values expressed in the tables contribute to the Chi-square value and, therefore, to the association between the variables tested. For a significance level of 5%, a statistically significant adjusted residual is the one that, in a module, is greater than 1.96 standard deviations (SD). Significant and positive residual values express a positive trend, that is, when more cases were observed than expected, while significant and negative residuals indicate a negative trend, that is, situations in which fewer cases were observed than expected10. The calculated AR values were expressed next to each observed frequency for cases in which the calculated Chi-square indicated a significant association (p-value <0.05).
For this study, we consider that a desirable trend in maternal behavior occurs when AR > +1.96 SD and there is correct perception, as in cases where the mother classifies a normal child as normal, or when AR < -1.96 SD and there is an incorrect perception, as the mother classifying an overweight child as normal one. Undesirable trends in maternal behavior happen in the opposite situations, that is, when there is incorrect perception and AR > +1.96 SD or correct perception and AR < -1.96 SD.
The agreement between mother perception and the child's nutritional status was assessed using the Kappa test. The analysis of the results was made for the total sample, by sex of the children and by mothers' education, marital status and work routine. The classifications adopted for the Kappa values11 were: poor (0-0.19); light (0.20-0.39); moderate (0.40-0.59); substantive (0.60-0.79) and almost perfect (0.80-1.00).
The analyzes were conducted using the Statistic Package for Social Sciences software v.23 (IBM SPSS for Windows, Chicago, USA). The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of São Paulo with registration number 1503/10.
RESULTS
The mean maternal age was 38 years (SD ± 7 years). Regarding education, 10.2% of the mothers who participated in the survey completed middle school, 61.9% completed high school and only 28% had university education completed. Of the mothers interviewed, 79.7% had a partner and 92.4% worked outside the home.
Of the total of 118 children, 55.1% were male. The mean weight, height and BMI were, respectively: 32.3 kg (SD ± 8.8 years), 130 cm (SD ± 0.10 cm) and 18.4 kg / m2 (minimum and maximum BMI were 13.4 and 33, respectively). As for nutritional classification, 30 (25.4%) were overweight and 26 (22%) obese, no child was classified as thinness.
We found 47.4% (56) of excessive weight children, with 46.4% (26) of them being obese and the remaining 53.6% (30) being overweight. The mothers of eutrophic children correctly classified 74.2% (46) of their children, representing 71.87% of the correct answers regarding eutrophic and excessive weight children combined (Table 1).
Mothers agreed on the nutritional classification of their children in 54.2% (64) in all cases, in 20% (6) of overweight children and 46.2% (12) of obese children. Among the mothers who made mistakes in their perception, 98.15% (53) underestimated the nutritional status of their children (they considered their children thinner than they really were) and 1.85% (1) as overestimated.
Mother perception was associated with the nutritional classification of their children, as well as for all sociodemographic variables (tables 1 to 4). The agreement analysis by Kappa showed poor agreement for: the total sample (0.14), mothers' education (middle, high school and university education with 0.19, 0.13 and 0.10, respectively), male (0.17), mothers' marital status (0.17 and 0.13 for those with and without partners, respectively) and for mothers' working outside the home (0.11). Mothers of girls and those who do not work out slightly agreed (0.36 and 0.27, respectively).
DISCUSSION
The proportion of excessive weight children in our study was higher than that found by some researchers12,13. Two studies14,15 obtained significantly lower values for overweight: 5.2% and 9, 7%, respectively.
The correct classifications of nutritional status varied little from the data in the literature for the total number of cases, for overweight and obese children. Among the incorrect classifications of mothers, our study showed a lower prevalence of overestimation in relation to the studies consulted13,14,16-27.
We found similarity with some studies for the Kappa result, which showed poor agreement for the general data16,17,21 while others obtained agreement ranging from mild to moderate14,25,27,28. Regarding gender, the agreement obtained in our study was similar to a study carried out in daycare centers in a city in southern Brazil29, being higher for mothers of girls; greater agreement for these mothers was also found in a study conducted with preschoolers17. None of the consulted sources evaluated the agreement regarding the mothers' education, work routine and marital status.
The eutrophic mothers were the ones who most correctly classified their children's NS. According to a systematic review4, most studies showed a higher percentage of correct responses between the mother perception and nutritional status of the children when they were eutrophic7,13,18,20,23-32. We found greater accuracy for the normal / eutrophic item. Nevertheless, the residual for lean / eutrophic (2.207) shows a mathematically significant underestimation. This indicates that a significant number of mothers underestimated them, even though, in absolute terms, most of them had a correct perception.
The same systematic review4 indicates that there is a tendency of underestimation for overweight children, being even greater for obese children in the studies that make this stratification18,20,23,25-27,32. In our study, the greatest contribution percentage of underestimation was for excessive weight children - 35.19% (38) of the total of mothers, in which 80% (24) of mothers of overweight children underestimated their children - however, the residuals for underestimation were not significant, indicating that this behavior was already expected. The underestimation of overweight children has a high prevalence, but it was not accompanied by an increasing trend of incorrect perception. Underestimatiom regarding the NS of eutrophic and obese children were, respectively, 24.1% (15) and 46.1% (14).
A study on MP in day care centers in a city in southern Brazil29 stated that mothers of overweight or obese children may have a better perception of nutritional status, since the clinical signs would be more visually perceptible. However, the consulted systematic review4 points out that studies have not confirmed this hypothesis. They show low mothers' ability to identify their excessive weight children and a better ability to identify normal weight for eutrophic children7,13,18,20,23-32. However, our study suggests that mothers of obese children tend to classify them correctly, as the adjusted residues point to a significant decrease in underestimation and a significant increase in correct perception. We believe that the non-realization of inferential statistics (residual analysis) for each correlation presented by the other authors may be the reason for the disagreement between our results and that verified in the systematic review, since none of these studies applied this statistical method.
Some studies have been devoted to investigating possible factors for incorrect maternal perception, such as the level of maternal education. Lower levels of education are often associated with worse levels of perception7,13,23,26,27,31,32, which was not found in this study. Proportionally, just as in a study on MP in the Federal District, in Brazil16, there was a worsening in perception with the increase in schooling, given that mothers with middle education got it right in 75% (9) of the cases, followed by mothers with high school, with 53.4% (39) of correct answers. Mothers with university education had correct perception in 48.4% (16) of the cases. Statistically, there were desirable tendencies to decrease underestimation and increase correct perception for mothers with primary and secondary education, but no residue was significant for those with university education. This corroborates the percentage data, as, statistically, lower school levels showed desirable trends in maternal behavior.
Mothers of boys have less correct perception in relation to mothers of girls18,26,32. A cross-sectional study carried out in private schools16 demonstrated that mothers of boys are more likely to underestimate them due to the idealization of a male body archetype as a more robust one and therefore linked to the idea of health. On the other hand, mothers of girls tend to be more critical in relation to nutritional status, yearning for a thinner silhouette, which is a reflection of cultural and social impositions. A study on the agreement between the NS measured and perceived by mothers of preschoolers17 concluded that many of them believe that the child's overweight will spread throughout his growth and he will not become an overweight teenager. Our study supports these statements given that 64.6% (42) of the mothers of girls had a correct perception, compared to 41.5% (22) of the mothers of boys. The residues suggest a tendency for underestimate of boys NS when they were eutrophic (2,054) and a tendency to correct perception for eutrophic and obese girls (2,586 for normal / eutrophic and 3,922 for overweight / obesity). The residuals corroborate the descriptive data, since a greater number of mothers of eutrophic boys, compared to mothers of eutrophic girls, underestimated them, 33.3% (8) against 18.42% (7), respectively.
Mothers of children of both sexes, according to the residual analysis, tend to underestimate less if their children is obese, despite having 66.7% underestimation of boys NS. Mothers of overweight boys also underestimated them more by percentage, 88.8% (15) against 69.2% (9) underestimation of overweight girls, but statistically this did not represent a trend, since the residuals were not significant.
So far, few studies have been dedicated to exploring the association of mothers' work routine with maternal perception. Some studies2,29 evaluated maternal occupation, but did not obtain statistical significance. For our study, this variable had a significant association and, although more than half of the mothers were correct in their perception, the adjusted residuals (1,968) suggest that those who work outside tend to underestimate more eutrophic children in relation to those who do not. Obese children were also significantly less underestimated by working outside the home mothers.
A descriptive study conducted in a city in northern Mexico3 also assessed the mothers' marital status, but found no statistical association. In our study, single mothers tend to underestimate their children's NS when they are eutrophic (2,012). Proportional data also indicate a greater misperception, given that 54.1% (41) of them were mistaken in perception.
A study carried out in Tuscany25, obtained a higher Kappa when the silhouette scale was used than the simple questionnaire, however, both values indicated moderate agreement between the MP and NS of their children. However, there is no consensus on the best tool used to assess maternal perception. Recent studies have used silhouette scales and simple questionnaires. Authors4 described that it was possible to identify differences in the ability of the two methods to assess maternal perception, with the caveat that the questionnaire method is likely to increase the underestimation percentages, when compared to the silhouette scale, which can be a limitation of our study.
We did not find in the literature another study that used the adjusted residual analysis as a statistical tool to assess the differences between maternal perception and nutritional status. The studies reviewed for the purpose of discussing this work were limited to using only descriptive statistics to assess the degree of correlation between the variables studied, given the significant statistical association. We believe that this may be the reason for the disagreement between the results obtained and those mentioned. Still, we conflict with descriptive statistics with the residual analysis to point out that there may be behavioral trends that are not identifiable in percentage.
CONCLUSION
The agreement between maternal perception and nutritional status was poor for the general data, for sex and mothers' education, work routine and marital status, with the exception of mothers of girls and those who do not work outside the home, having a slighlty agreement.
Mothers of obese children tend to classify them correctly. This was not verified statistically for eutrophic and overweight children. Single mothers and mothers who work outside the home of eutrophic children tend to underestimate their children's NS.
Lower education levels (middle and high school) showed a tendency of correct perception, which was not observed for mothers with university education. There is a tendency of underestimation for boys and of correct perception for girls, that is, mothers of girls perceive their daughters more correctly compared to mothers of boys.
Author Contributions
Gustavo Carreiro Pinasco - Conceptualization, Investigation, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Visualization, Project administration, Supervision, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing and Proofreading.
Arthur Brunelli Sales - Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing.
Carla Venância Aguilar Santos - Data curation, Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing and Proofreading.
Elizandra Cola - Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing and Proofreading.
Eduardo Moreno Júdice de Mattos Farina - Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing and Proofreading.
Fabiano Novaes Barcellos Filho - Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing and Proofreading.
Willer França Fiorotti - Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing and Proofreading.
Luiz Carlos de Abreu - Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Supervision, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing and Proofreading.
Funding
The study did not receive funding from any organization
Acknowledgments
We thank the childrens' parents of the Núcleo de Educação Infantil - Escola Paulistinha de Educação and the Pediatric Nutrology Department at UNIFESP. The financial viability of the article is due to the Acre - Health Project in the Western Amazon (multi-institutional agreement process no. 007/2015 SESACRE-UFAC-FMABC).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare to having no conflict of interests.
REFERENCES
1.Rivera, J., de Cossío, T., Pedraza, L., Aburto, T., Sánchez, T. and Martorell, R. Childhood and adolescent overweight and obesity in Latin America: a systematic review. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014; 2(4): 321-332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-8587(13)70173-6 [ Links ]
2.Costa L, Rubio KL, Lopes SMA, Tanouye ATA, Bertolini SMMG, Branco BHM. Effects of 12 weeks of interdisciplinary interventions on behavioral and eating parameters of adolescents with overweight or obesity. J Hum Growth Dev. 2019; 29(2): 177-186. DOI: http://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.v29.9417 [ Links ]
3.Juarez Mendez V. Características maternas e infantiles asociadas a obesidad en lactantes menores de un año de edad del norte de méxico. Nutr Hosp. 2019; 7; 36(1): 244. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20960/nh.2388 [ Links ]
4.Francescatto C, Santos NS, Coutinho VF, Costa RF. Mothers' perceptions about the nutritional status of their overweight children: a systematic review. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2014; 90(4): 332-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2014.01.009 [ Links ]
5.Bhadoria A, Sahoo K, Sahoo B, Choudhury A, Sufi N, Kumar R. Childhood obesity: Causes and consequences. J Family Med Prim Care. 2015; 4(2): 187-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/2249-4863.154628 [ Links ]
6.Keller K, Olsen A, Kuilema L, Meyermann K, Belle C. Predictors of parental perceptions and concerns about child weight. Appetite. 2013; 62: 96-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2012.11.016 [ Links ]
7.Baughcum A, Chamberlin L, Deeks C, Powers S, Whitaker R. Maternal Perceptions of Overweight Preschool Children. Pediatrics. 2000; 106(6): 1380-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.106.6.1380 [ Links ]
8.Medeiros AJ, Palmeira PA, Lima JS, Cardoso VVBP. Longitudinal monitoring of nutritional status of schoolchildren at a public school. J Hum Growth Dev. 2020; 30(2): 209-215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.v30.10367 [ Links ]
9.Novaes J, Lamounier J, Franceschini S, Priore S. Fatores ambientais associados ao sobrepeso infantil. Rev. Nutr. 2009;22(5):661-673. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1415-52732009000500007 [ Links ]
10.Callegari-Jacques S. Bioestatística. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2007. [ Links ]
11.Landis J, Koch G. The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics. 1977; 33(1): 159-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310 [ Links ]
12.Rhee K. Factors Associated With Parental Readiness to Make Changes for Overweight Children.Pediatrics. 2005; 116(1): e94-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2004-2479 [ Links ]
13.Aparício G, Cunha M, Duarte J, Pereira A, Bonito J, Albuquerque C. Nutritional status in preschool children: current trends of mother's body perception and concerns. Aten Primaria. 2013; 45(Suppl 2): 194-200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0212-6567(13)70022-2 [ Links ]
14.Boa-Sorte N, Neri L, Leite M, Brito S, Meirelles A, Luduvice F et al. Maternal perceptions and self-perception of the nutritional status of children and adolescents from private schools. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2007; 83(4): 349-356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2223/jped.1678 [ Links ]
15.Duarte L, Fujimori E, Minagawa Toriyama A, Palombo C, Borges A, Kurihayashi A. Brazilian Maternal Weight Perception and Satisfaction With Toddler Body Size: A Study in Primary Health Care. Journal of Pediatric Nursing. J Pediatr Nurs. 2016; 31(5): 490-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2016.03.022 [ Links ]
16.Pedroso J, Toral N, Gubert M. Maternal perception of children's nutritional status in the Federal District, Brazil. PLoS One. 2017; 26; 12(4): e0176344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176344 [ Links ]
17.Pedraza D, Sousa C, Olinda R. CONCORDÂNCIA ENTRE O ESTADO NUTRICIONAL AFERIDO E O PERCEBIDO PELAS MÃES EM CRIANÇAS PRÉ-ESCOLARES. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2017; 35(3): 289-295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-0462/;2017;35;3;00011 [ Links ]
18.Boutelle K, Fulkerson J, Neumark-Sztainer D, Story M. Mothers' Perceptions of Their Adolescents' Weight Status: Are They Accurate?. Obes Res. 2004; 12(11): 1754-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2004.217 [ Links ]
19.Genovesi S, Giussani M, Faini A, Vigorita F, Pieruzzi F, Grazia Strepparava M et al. Maternal perception of excess weight in children: A survey conducted by paediatricians in the province of Milan. Acta Paediatr. 2005; 94(6): 747-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2005.tb01975.x [ Links ]
20.BRACHO M FERNANDO, RAMOS H ELIANA. Percepción materna del estado nutricional de sus hijos: ¿Es un factor de riesgo para presentar malnutrición por exceso?. Rev. chil. pediatr. 2007; 78(1): 20-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0370-41062007000100003 [ Links ]
21.Guevara-Cruz, M., Serralde-Zúñiga, A. E., Frigolet Vázquez-Vela, M.ª E., Blancas Galicia, L., Islas-Ortega, L., Association between maternal perceptions and actual nutritional status for children in a study group in Mexico. Nutr Hosp, 2012; 27(1): 209-212. [ Links ]
22.Rosas L, Harley K, Guendelman S, Fernald L, Mejia F, Eskenazi B. Maternal Perception of Child Weight Among Mexicans in California and Mexico. Matern Child Health J. 2010; 14(6): 886-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-009-0534-6 [ Links ]
23.Binkin N, Spinelli A, Baglio G, Lamberti A. What is common becomes normal: The effect of obesity prevalence on maternal perception. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2013; 23(5): 410-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2011.09.006 [ Links ]
24.Hackie M, Bowles C. Maternal Perception of Their Overweight Children. Public Health Nurs. 2007; 24(6): 538-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1446.2007.00666.x [ Links ]
25.Lazzeri G, Casorelli A, Giallombardo D, Grasso A, Guidoni C, Menoni E, Giacchi M. Nutritional surveillance in Tuscany: maternal perception of nutritional status of 8-9 y-old school-children. J Prev Med Hyg. 2006; 47(1): 16-21. [ Links ]
26.Manios Y, Kondaki K, Kourlaba G, Vasilopoulou E, Grammatikaki E. Maternal perceptions of their child's weight status: the GENESIS study. Public Health Nutr. 2009; 12(8): 1099-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s1368980008004412 [ Links ]
27.Molina M, Faria C, Montero P, Cade N. Correspondence between children's nutritional status and mothers' perceptions: a population-based study. Cad Saude Publica. 2009; 25(10): 2285-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2009001000018 [ Links ]
28.Hirschler V, Gonzalez C, Talgham S, Jadzinsky M. Do mothers of overweight Argentinean preschool children perceive them as such?. Pediatr Diabetes. 2006; 7(4): 201-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-5448.2006.00183.x [ Links ]
29.Giacomossi M, Zanella T, Höfelmann D. Percepção materna do estado nutricional de crianças de creches de cidade do Sul do Brasil. Rev. Nutr. 2011; 24(5): 689-702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-52732011000500003 [ Links ]
30.Carnell S, Edwards C, Croker H, Boniface D, Wardle J. Parental perceptions of overweight in 3-5 y olds. Int J Obes (Lond). 2005; 29(4): 353-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0802889 [ Links ]
31.de Hoog M, Stronks K, van Eijsden M, Gemke R, Vrijkotte T. Ethnic differences in maternal underestimation of offspring's weight: the ABCD study. Int J Obes (Lond). 2012; 36(1): 53-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2011.199 [ Links ]
32.Maynard LM, Galuska DA, Blanck HM, Serdula MK. Maternal perceptions of weight status of children. Pediatrics. 2003; 111(5 Pt 2): 1226-31. [ Links ]
Correspondence:
Gustavo Carreiro Pinasco
gustavo.pinasco@emescam.br
Received: December 2019
Revised: April 2020
Accepted: September 2020