SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.34 número3Atenção primária e a população transgênero: da prática clínica às ações de educação em saúde índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

artigo

Indicadores

Compartilhar


Journal of Human Growth and Development

versão impressa ISSN 0104-1282versão On-line ISSN 2175-3598

J. Hum. Growth Dev. vol.34 no.3 Santo André  2024  Epub 11-Abr-2025

https://doi.org/10.36311/jhgd.v34.16851 

EDITORIAL

Breastfeeding Support for All: Narrowing Inequalities for Nurturing a Future That Is Fair and Sustainable

Tamires dos Santos Vieiraa 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3899-3664

Tassiane Cristina Moraisb  c 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5101-2883

Teresa Gontijo de Castrod 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1275-4072

aGraduate Program in Nutrition and Health, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitória/ES, Brazil

bGraduate Program in Public Policies and Local Development, School of Sciences of Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Vitória (EMESCAM), Vitória/ES, Brazil

cGraduate Program in Collective Health, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitória/ES, Brazil

dDepartment of Nutrition & Dietetics, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand


Abstract

Early initiation of breastfeeding, duration, and exclusivity are internationally recommended practices to maximize impact in preventing and reducing the double burden of malnutrition, reducing child mortality and other morbidities, improving child development, and reducing health costs. The protection, promotion, and support of breastfeeding are also central to countries' commitments to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Global progress in breastfeeding rates has been reported in past years. However, many children are still left behind and are not receiving the numerous benefits of breastfeeding. There are also relevant inequities in breastfeeding rates across global regions and countries and between groups from different socioeconomic statuses and cultural backgrounds within countries. These inequities are also extended to the frequency and availability of comparable standardized indicators worldwide. In 2023, globally only 39% of the countries provided information on exclusive breastfeeding rates to the age of six months, and 7% assessed their overall breastfeeding support programs in the past five years. The increase in the coverage and frequency of monitoring globally agreed breastfeeding targets and the assessment of the impact of breastfeeding programs are imperative to providing breastfeeding support for all and increasing breastfeeding prevalence equitably. Breastfeeding can be an equalizer in society; no one should be left behind. Only this way can breastfeeding mums be celebrated in all their diversity and journeys, attending the 2024 World Breastfeeding Week call.

Keywords Breastfeeding; Global Nutrition Targets; Sustainable Development Goals; Inequalities

Data from the World Health Organization indicate that globally, 149 million under-five-year-olds are estimated to be stunted, 45 million are wasted, and 37 million are overweight/obese. Additionally, every year, it is estimated that 2.7 million child deaths are due to undernutrition1. Recent findings examining worldwide trends in underweight and obesity from 1990 to 2022 among 222 million adults, adolescents, and school-aged children have shown that in almost all countries and for all age groups, the combined burden of underweight and obesity has increased and was driven by an increase in obesity, while underweight and thinness remain prevalent in south Asia and parts of Africa. In 2022, the double burden of malnutrition among 5-19-year-olds was dominated by a higher prevalence of obesity than thinness among girls in 133 countries (67%) and boys in 125 countries (63%). More than 90% of the double burden consisted of obesity among girls from 25 countries and boys from 17 countries2.

One of the internationally recommended practices to maximize impact in the prevention and reduction of the double burden of malnutrition, reduce child mortality and other morbidities, improve child development, and reduce health costs is the promotion and support of optimal nutrition during the first few years of life, including early initiation of breastfeeding, its duration, and exclusivity1,3. The benefits of breastfeeding for children`s and women's health in the short and long term and for society`s human capital and economy are well established4,5,6,7,8.

For babies, breastfeeding provides essential nutritional and immunologically active factors9,10 and is associated with the reduced risk of infectious diseases, respiratory tract infections, obesity, lower blood pressure, and reduced incidence of diabetes and asthma4,5,8,11,12,13. Given the immaturity of the immune system of newborns (especially the mucosal one), breastfeeding has significant relevance in protecting infants against infectious diseases. Through colostrum and breast milk, infants receive specific immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory factors14,15 essential for safeguarding and directly modulating their immune system14.

The colostrum is a transparent or yellow secretion produced by the mammary glands during the first 3-5 days of newborns` lives16. The components of colostrum interact through a complex network to influence both innate and adaptive immune responses, primarily by producing cytokines and immunoglobulins14,17. After this initial breastfeeding stage, the breast milk adapts extraordinarily to babies’ ontogeny and immunological and nutrition needs15. The establishment of breastfeeding within the first hour after a baby's birth (known as the “Golden hour”) can help guarantee that babies receive the colostrum and is crucial for creating the mother-baby emotional bond, increasing the chance of successful breastfeeding18. Additionally, for mothers, breastfeeding also impacts positively on their health, including a reduced risk of ovarian and breast cancers19,20, lower incidence of type II diabetes21, and heart attack22. Breastfeeding also contributes to the lipid metabolism of mothers after giving birth, helping reduce blood levels of cholesterol and other lipids23.

In addition to the numerous benefits for both mother and baby, breastfeeding offers significant social advantages5,24. Investing in breastfeeding is one of the wisest decisions a country can make to ensure its future prosperity, as this action boosts national economies, reduces healthcare costs, and creates more competent workforces due to human milk's health and brain-building benefits24.

Breastfeeding has the power to save lives; it has been estimated that globally, the almost universal expansion of optimal breastfeeding rates could save the lives of more than 820,000 under-five-year-olds17 and 20,000 deaths due to breast cancer annually4. Not breastfeeding represents an economic loss of 302 billion dollars/year or 0.49% of the world's gross national income5. Social costs are also exacerbated by the lack of recognition of the value of breast milk production in the national gross domestic product (GDP). The market value of the production and sales of infant formula is included in a nation's GDP, while the value of breast milk production is not, impacting the misrepresentation of the economic contributions and health benefits associated with breastfeeding25. The main factors influencing the financial loss of not breastfeeding include spending on illnesses and healthcare, such as obesity, premature deaths from pneumonia and diarrhea, and breast cancer, all problems potentially avoided by the practice of breastfeeding5,6.

The combined benefits of breastfeeding make its protection, promotion, and support central to the global commitments within the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development26,27, as breastfeeding is intrinsically linked to advances in the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)27. The link with SDG 12 (ensuring sustainable consumption and production patterns) is due to the environmental benefits of breastfeeding27,28,29,30,31.

Human milk is a sustainable and ecological diet that produces no waste and requires no packaging, preparation, or transportation31,32. Breastfeeding does not require intensive dairy farming and the use of freshwater. Breastfeeding does not produce waste once the supply equals the demand35,36. Exclusive breastfeeding directly at the breast has a minimal ecological footprint compared to feeding babies infant formula. Infant formula production increases greenhouse gas emissions and contributes to global warming and land, freshwater, and seawater pollution due to the processes involved in raw material extraction, production, use, and waste treatment24,28.

The Global Strategy for Infant and Young Child Feeding, developed by the WHO and UNICEF and launched in 2003, is intended to improve the nutritional status, growth, health, and survival of infants and young children through optimal feeding35. The Strategy represents a combination of recommendations and initiatives, including the nutritional recommendations36,37 and the Comprehensive Implementation Plan on Maternal, Infant, and Young Child Nutrition.

The Plan set the global nutrition targets (GNTs) to be achieved by 202513,38, a posteriori updated with targets to be met by 203039, in alignment with the 2030 Agenda for the Sustainable Development Goals26,39. Recommendations are that global efforts should be made for all children to have a better nutritional start in life. This means infants put to the breast within one hour of birth, receiving breastfeeding exclusively for the first six months of life, and continuing to be breastfed to 2 years of age or beyond. From 6 months, breastfeeding should be complemented with safe, age-appropriate feeding of nutritious solid, semi-solid, and soft foods37. Exclusive breastfeeding to age six months represents one of the six core GNTs, and global initiatives have been recommended to reach a prevalence of at least 50% by 202540 and at least 70% by 203039.

Data from 2000 to 2019 from 113 low-middle-income and high-income countries on breastfeeding rates and trends and recent data from the Global Breastfeeding Collective have documented global progress in breastfeeding rates33,34. In 2023, 46% of infants were breastfed in the first hour after birth, and 71% and 45% of the children, respectively, were being breastfed at ages 1 and 2 years34. The prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding to age six months was 48%36, close to the global target for 202534. These findings resulted from a combined set of international recommendations to increase the prevalence of breastfeeding, but the degree of implementation of each varied widely globally.

These recommendations have been: i) to increase investment in programs and policies that promote, protect, and support breastfeeding; ii) to fully implement the international code of marketing of breast milk substitutes and legislation for effective enforcement; iii) to enact legislation to guarantee 100% paid maternity leave for at least 18 weeks and for workplaces to provide the facilities and support for mothers to continue breastfeeding when they return to work; iv) to implement the ten steps for successful breastfeeding in maternity facilities (babyfriendly hospital initiative); v) to improve access to skilled breastfeeding counselling in healthcare facilities; vi) to encourage community support programs and networks that protect, promote and support breastfeeding; vii) to invest in policies and programs that ensure breastfeeding continues during situations of emergency and; viii) to implement systems that monitor, evaluate, and track progress on breastfeeding rates, policies, programs, and funding34.

Despite recent global progress in breastfeeding, many children are still left behind and are not receiving the numerous benefits of breastfeeding. Significant inequities in breastfeeding rates were registered across global regions and countries4,8,33,34,41,42,43,44 and between areas and groups from different socioeconomic statuses and cultural backgrounds within countries44,45,46. Designing interventions that respond to specific challenges of groups and are delivered in a culturally appropriate manner requires the understanding that inequalities in breastfeeding protection, promotion, and support are shaped by economic, social, and cultural forces that interact in a given context5,6,31,47,48,49.

For an equitable increase in the prevalence of breastfeeding, it is also crucial that inequities in the frequency and availability of standardized indicators that are comparable worldwide are narrowed4,33,34,42. For example, the low frequency of data collection on breastfeeding indicators and the lack of standardization of indicators to allow global comparisons and agreed targets have been commonly reported for high-income countries4,8,33,34,42. For several high-income countries, data on the duration of exclusive breastfeeding to six months is lacking or is outdated4,8,33,44,42.

It is also equally crucial that countries continuously assess existing policies and programs so accountabilities for the inputs, outputs, outcomes, and impact can be drawn at global, national, and sub-national levels50. In 2023, globally, only 39% and 7% of the countries, respectively, provided information on rates of exclusive breastfeeding to 6 months and assessed their overall breastfeeding support programs in the past five years34.

The increase in the coverage and frequency of monitoring globally agreed breastfeeding targets and the assessment of the impact of breastfeeding programs are imperative to providing breastfeeding support for all and increasing breastfeeding prevalence equitably. Breastfeeding can be an equalizer in society; no one should be left behind. Only this way, breastfeeding mums can be celebrated in all their diversity and journeys, attending the call of the 2024 World Breastfeeding Week50.

Thus, the Journal of Human Growth and Development (JHGD) is a scientific journal dedicated to publishing studies on growth, human development, and health. Its editorial line is based on principles that reflect scientific rigor, interdisciplinarity, and social relevance.

Some of these principles include interdisciplinarity: The journal encompasses areas such as health, education, social sciences, and other related disciplines, fostering a broad and diverse scientific dialogue; focus on public health and equity: many published articles address public health issues, emphasizing topics that promote equity in access to health and well-being; ethical commitment and methodological rigor: the journal values ethical research practices, requiring all submitted articles to meet international standards for ethics in research involving humans and animals and open access: it ensures that research findings are freely available to the public, enhancing the dissemination and impact of scientific knowledge.

Additionally, the journal promotes internationalization by publishing articles in English and featuring studies by researchers from various parts of the world, offering a global perspective on the topics addressed. It also emphasizes social relevance, publishing studies that not only advance scientific knowledge but also have practical and policy implications, contributing to improving the quality of life for the population.

Its multiple contributions, presented in issue 3 of volume 3451,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65, reflect these policies throughout its 34 years of uninterrupted publication, consistently aligned with the development of individuals.

These principles make JHGD an important platform for disseminating relevant studies, particularly in the fields of human development and public health.

REFERENCES

1 Infant and young child feeding [Internet]. [cited 2024 Sep 3]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/infant-and-young-child-feedingLinks ]

2 NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Worldwide trends in underweight and obesity from 1990 to 2022: a pooled analysis of 3663 population-representative studies with 222 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet [Internet]. 2024 Mar 16;403(10431):1027–50. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02750-2Links ]

3 Dykes F, Hall-Moran V, editors. Infant and young child feeding [Internet]. Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009 [cited 2024 Aug 5]. 232 p. Available from: https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Infant+and+Young+Child+Feeding-p-9781444315325Links ]

4 Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJD, França GVA, Horton S, Krasevec J, et al. Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet [Internet]. 2016 Jan 30;387(10017):475–90. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01024-7Links ]

5 Rollins NC, Bhandari N, Hajeebhoy N, Horton S, Lutter CK, Martines JC, et al. Why invest, and what it will take to improve breastfeeding practices? Lancet [Internet]. 2016 Jan 30;387(10017):491–504. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01044-2Links ]

6 Walters DD, Phan LT, Mathisen R. The cost of not breastfeeding: global results from a new tool. Health Policy Plan. 2019 Jul;34(6):407-417. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czz050. [ Links ]

7 Short-term effects of breastfeeding: a systematic review on the benefits of breastfeeding on diarrhoea and pneumonia mortality [Internet]. World Health Organization; 2013 [cited 2024 Sep 3]. Available from: http://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241506120Links ]

8 Rito AI, Buoncristiano M, Spinelli A, Salanave B, Kunešová M, Hejgaard T, et al. Association between Characteristics at Birth, Breastfeeding and Obesity in 22 Countries: The WHO European Childhood Obesity Surveillance Initiative - COSI 2015/2017. Obes Facts [Internet]. 2019 Apr 26;12(2):226–43. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000500425Links ]

9 Alotiby AA. The role of breastfeeding as a protective factor against the development of the immunemediated diseases: A systematic review. Front Pediatr [Internet]. 2023 Feb 16;11:1086999. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2023.1086999Links ]

10 Vassilopoulou E, Feketea G, Koumbi L, Mesiari C, Berghea EC, Konstantinou GN. Breastfeeding and COVID-19: From Nutrition to Immunity. Front Immunol [Internet]. 2021 Apr 7;12:661806. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.661806Links ]

11 Short-term effects of breastfeeding: a systematic review on the benefits of breastfeeding on diarrhoea and pneumonia mortality [Internet]. World Health Organization; 2013 [cited 2024 Aug 5]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241506120Links ]

12 McCulloch J. Global Breastfeeding Collective News Brief. J Hum Lact [Internet]. 2022 Nov;38(4):793. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08903344221118849Links ]

13 Organization WH, Others. Comprehensive implementation plan on maternal, infant and young child nutrition [Internet]. World Health Organization; 2014. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/113048Links ]

14 Garofalo RP, Goldman AS. Expression of functional immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory factors in human milk. Clin Perinatol [Internet]. 1999 Jun;26(2):361–77. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10394492Links ]

15 Palmeira P, Carneiro-Sampaio M. Immunology of breast milk. Rev Assoc Med Bras [Internet]. 2016 Sep;62(6):584–93. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.62.06.584Links ]

16 Acharya S, Thapa B, Dhakal AK, Singh SK. Colostrum Feeding among Newborns Visiting the Outpatient Department of Pediatrics of a Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc [Internet]. 2023 Mar 1;61(259):204–7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.31729/jnma.8062Links ]

17 Pereira G do AV, Morais TC, França EL, Daboin BEG, Bezerra IMP, Pessoa RS, et al. Leptin, Adiponectin, and Melatonin Modulate Colostrum Lymphocytes in Mothers with Obesity. Int J Mol Sci [Internet]. 2023 Jan 31;24(3). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24032662Links ]

18 Lamary M, Bertoni CB, Schwabenbauer K, Ibrahim J. Neonatal Golden Hour: a review of current best practices and available evidence. Curr Opin Pediatr [Internet]. 2023 Apr 1;35(2):209-17. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0000000000001224Links ]

19 Kotsopoulos J, Gronwald J, McCuaig JM, Karlan BY, Eisen A, Tung N, et al. Breastfeeding and the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer among women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Gynecol Oncol [Internet]. 2020 Dec;159(3):820-6. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.09.037Links ]

20 Modugno F, Goughnour SL, Wallack D, Edwards RP, Odunsi K, Kelley JL, et al. Breastfeeding factors and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol [Internet]. 2019 Apr;153(1):116-22. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.01.017Links ]

21 Horta BL, de Lima NP Breastfeeding and Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Curr Diab Rep [Internet]. 2019 Jan 14;19(1):1. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11892-019-1121-xLinks ]

22 Bhatnagar D, Bhatnagar P. Breastfeeding and cardiovascular risk factors. Curr Opin Lipidol [Internet]. 2019 Feb;30(1):45-7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MOL.0000000000000564Links ]

23 Zhang Z, Lai M, Piro AL, Alexeeff SE, Allalou A, Röst HL, et al. Intensive lactation among women with recent gestational diabetes significantly alters the early postpartum circulating lipid profile: the SWIFT study. BMC Med [Internet]. 2021 Oct 8;19(1):241. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-02095-1Links ]

24 Nurturing the health and wealth of nations: the investment case for breastfeeding [Internet]. [cited 2024 Aug 9]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/nurturing-the-health-and-wealth-of-nations-the-investment-case-for-breastfeedingLinks ]

25 Smith JP, Folbre N. New Ways to Measure Economic Activity: Breastfeeding as an Economic Indicator. In: Sawer M, Jenkins F, Downing K, editors. How Gender Can Transform the Social Sciences: Innovation and Impact [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020. p. 105-16. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43236-2_11Links ]

26 Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. In: A New Era in Global Health [Internet]. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company; 2018 [cited 2024 Aug 5]. Available from: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agendaLinks ]

27 World Alliance for Breastfeeding Action [Internet]. [cited 2024 Aug 12]. Waba Home. Available from: https://waba.org.my/Links ]

28 Andresen EC, Hjelkrem AGR, Bakken AK, Andersen LF Environmental Impact of Feeding with Infant Formula in Comparison with Breastfeeding. Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 2022 May 24;19(11). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116397Links ]

29 Bai YK, Alsaidi M. Sustainable Breastfeeding: A State-of-the Art Review. J Hum Lact [Internet]. 2024 Feb;40(1):57-68. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08903344231216094Links ]

30 Unicef, Others. Breastfeeding and the sustainable development goals: Factsheet. URL: https://worldbreastfeedingweekorg/20.2016;16.Links ]

31 Baker P, Santos T, Neves PA, Machado P, Smith J, Piwoz E, et al. First-food systems transformations and the ultra-processing of infant and young child diets: The determinants, dynamics and consequences of the global rise in commercial milk formula consumption. Matern Child Nutr [Internet]. 2021 Apr;17(2):e13097. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13097Links ]

32 Baby Friendly Initiative [Internet]. Unicef UK; 2022 [cited 2024 Aug 12]. Breastfeeding and climate change. Available from: https://www.unicef.org.uk/babyfriendly/breastfeeding-and-climate-change/Links ]

33 Neves PAR, Vaz JS, Maia FS, Baker P, Gatica-Domínguez G, Piwoz E, et al. Rates and time trends in the consumption of breastmilk, formula, and animal milk by children younger than 2 years from 2000 to 2019: analysis of 113 countries. Lancet Child Adolesc Health [Internet]. 2021 Sep;5(9):619-30. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(21)00163-2Links ]

34 Global breastfeeding scorecard 2023 [Internet]. [cited 2024 Aug 5]. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/documents/global-breastfeeding-scorecard-2023Links ]

35 Saadeh MR. A new global strategy for infant and young child feeding. Forum Nutr [Internet]. 2003;56:236-8. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15806879Links ]

36 Indicators for assessing infant and young child feeding practices: part 1 definition [Internet]. World Health Organization; 2008 [cited 2024 Aug 5]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241596664Links ]

37 Indicators for assessing infant and young child feeding practices: definitions and measurement methods [Internet]. World Health Organization; 2021 [cited 2024 Aug 5]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240018389Links ]

38 World Health Organization. Global Nutrition Monitoring Framework: operational guidance for tracking progress in meeting targets for 2025 [Internet]. World Health Organization; 2017 [cited 2024 Aug 5]. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/259904Links ]

39 Arora A. UNICEF DATA. UNICEF; 2019 [cited 2024 Aug 5]. WHO/UNICEF discussion paper: The extension of the 2025 maternal, infant and young child nutrition targets to 2030. Available from: https://data.unicef.org/resources/who-unicef-discussion-paper-nutrition-targets/Links ]

40 World Health Organization. Comprehensive implementation plan on maternal, infant and young child nutrition [Internet]. World Health Organization; 2014 [cited 2024 Aug 5]. Report No.: WHO/NMH/NHD/14.1. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/113048Links ]

41 Zong X ’nan, Wu H, Zhao M, Magnussen CG, Xi B. Global prevalence of WHO infant feeding practices in 57 LMICs in 2010-2018 and time trends since 2000 for 44 LMICs. EClinicalMedicine [Internet]. 2021 Jul;37:100971. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100971Links ]

42 Vaz JS, Maia MFS, Neves PAR, Santos TM, Vidaletti LP, Victora C. Monitoring breastfeeding indicators in high-income countries: Levels, trends and challenges. Matern Child Nutr [Internet]. 2021 Jul;17(3):e13137. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13137Links ]

43 Bhattacharjee NV, Schaeffer LE, Hay SI, Local Burden of Disease Exclusive Breastfeeding Collaborators. Mapping inequalities in exclusive breastfeeding in low- and middle-income countries, 2000-2018. Nat Hum Behav [Internet]. 2021 Aug;5(8):1027-45. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01108-6Links ]

44 Castro T, Grant C, Wall C, Welch M, Marks E, Fleming C, et al. Breastfeeding indicators among a nationally representative multi-ethnic sample of New Zealand children. N Z Med J [Internet]. 2017 Dec 1;130(1466):34-44. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29197899Links ]

45 Boccolini CS, Lacerda EM de A, Bertoni N, Oliveira N, Alves-Santos NH, Farias DR, et al. Trends of breastfeeding indicators in Brazil from 1996 to 2019 and the gaps to achieve the WHO/UNICEF 2030 targets. BMJ Glob Health [Internet]. 2023 Sep;8(9). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012529Links ]

46 Quintero SM, Strassle PD, Londoño Tobón A, Ponce S, Alhomsi A, Maldonado AI, et al. Race/ethnicity-specific associations between breastfeeding information source and breastfeeding rates among U.S. women. BMC Public Health [Internet]. 2023 Mar 17;23(1):520. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15447-8Links ]

47 Sanghvi TG, Godha D, Frongillo EA. Inequalities in large-scale breastfeeding programmes in Bangladesh, Burkina Faso and Vietnam. Matern Child Nutr [Internet]. 2024 Jul 17;e13687. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13687Links ]

48 Shenker NS, Nangia S. Nonprofit human milk banking: On a challenging path to global equity. Matern Child Nutr [Internet]. 2024 Jun;20 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):e13623. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13623Links ]

49 Grant A, Pell B, Copeland L, Brown A, Ellis R, Morris D, et al. Views and experience of breastfeeding in public: A qualitative systematic review. Matern Child Nutr [Internet]. 2022 Oct;18(4):e13407. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13407Links ]

50 Monitoring the progress of breastfeeding practices, policies, programmes and funding [Internet]. [cited 2024 Aug 5]. Available from: https://www.globalbreastfeedingcollective.org/documents/monitoring-progress-breastfeeding-practices-policies-programmes-and-fundingLinks ]

51 Tristan-Cheever E, Bezerra IMP, Alves SAA, Oliveira MAS, Barros EPM, Bauduina ET, Ramos JLS, Junior ADA, Abreu LC. Primary care and the transgender population: from clinical practice to health education actions. J Hum Growth Dev. 2024; 34(3):383-395. DOI: http://doi.org/10.36311/jhgd.v34.16595Links ]

52 Torres MMSM, Kawano MM, Souza BB, Medeiros ESM, Carvalho CPPX, Lima MSFS, Barbosa CP, Drezett J. Pregnancy resulting from sexual violence committed by the intimate partner: characterization of the crime and abortion provided for by law. J Hum Growth Dev. 2024; 34(3):396-409. DOI: http://doi.org/10.36311/jhgd.v34.16784Links ]

53 Ortega GP, do Amaral GLG, Jacó TRF, Costa TN, Monteiro WM, Bernarde PS. Accidents with fish during artisanal fishing in forest communities in the western amazon. J Hum Growth Dev. 2024; 34(3):410-419. DOI: http://doi.org/10.36311/jhgd.v34.16536Links ]

54 Dametas E, Salaroli LB, Petarli GB, Martinelli KG, Bortolo GP, dos Santos-Neto ET. Diagnosis of anemia in pregnant women according to gestational weeks and world health organization criteria. J Hum Growth Dev. 2024; 34(3):420-429. DOI: http://doi.org/10.36311/jhgd.v34.16786Links ]

55 Lopes JRA, D’Agostino Dias M, Batalha MAB, Guerra LKD, Correa JA. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for healing chronic foot wounds in diabetic patients: randomized clinical trial. J Hum Growth Dev. 2024; 34(3):430-440. DOI: http://doi.org/10.36311/jhgd.v34.16415Links ]

56 Gomes CF, Jamberci AFA, Santos CS, Valério-Penha AG, Sá-Caputo DC, Bernardo-Filho M, Aros MS, Carloni MB, Duarte SG, Bachur CAK, Bachur JA. Coexistence between anxiety and depression disorders in obese people: a scope review. J Hum Growth Dev. 2024; 34(3):441-450. DOI: http://doi.org/10.36311/jhgd.v34.16787Links ]

57 Costa LS, Silvestre DN, Martins CA, Santos Neto ET, Salaroli LB, Cunha AC. Dynapenic abdominal obesity and leisure activities in hemodialysis patients. J Hum Growth Dev. 2024; 34(3):451-463. DOI: http://doi.org/10.36311/jhgd.v34.16155Links ]

58 Peterle FZ, Martins CA, dos Santos Neto ET, Salaroli LB. Chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder in individuals on hemodialysis and its correlations with clinical, anthropometric and laboratory conditions. J Hum Growth Dev. 2024; 34(3):464-472. DOI: http://doi.org/10.36311/jhgd.v34.15873Links ]

59 Silva Neto JJ, Medeiros MMR, Silva IBC, Costa EG, Santos EFS, Wajnsztejn R. Electromyography in subjects with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and dysphagia: cross-sectional study. J Hum Growth Dev. 2024; 34(3):473-481. DOI: http://doi.org/10.36311/jhgd.v34.16788Links ]

60 Fürst RVC, Fech RL, Lee FJJ, Zuniga R, Corrêa JA.Use of autologous tissue regeneration matrix (pro prf) in the treatment of diabetic ulcers: case series. J Hum Growth Dev. 2024; 34(3):482-491. DOI: http://doi.org/10.36311/jhgd.v34.16849Links ]

61 Melo RMSB, Bezerra IMP, Morais GB, Messetti PAS, Wajnsztejn R. The judicialization of medicines in a Western amazon state: a patient and State relationship. J Hum Growth Dev. 2024; 34(3):492-507. DOI: http://doi.org/10.36311/jhgd.v34.16303Links ]

62 Oliveira MLB, Santos JA, Oliveira Abreu CIP, Monteiro CBM, Bezerra IMP. Teaching-learning process in the undergraduate nursing course: training in the perspective of health promotion from the point of view of Paulo Freire. J Hum Growth Dev. 2024; 34(3):508-517. DOI: http://doi.org/10.36311/jhgd.v34.16795Links ]

63 Martins MA, Teixeira BFR, Moreira CA, Martins WH. Diagnostic elucidation between primary sweat gland or breast cancer metastasis: case report of mucinous carcinoma of the scalp. J Hum Growth Dev. 2024; 34(3):518-523. DOI: http://doi.org/10.36311/jhgd.v34.16789Links ]

64 Ramos ACF, Silva RMF, Campos MH, Bizinotto T, Rezende LMT, Miñana-Signes V, Monfort-Pañego M, Silva Noll PR, Noll M. Evaluating instruments to assess spinal health knowledge in adolescents aged 14-17: a scoping review. J Hum Growth Dev. 2024; 34(3):524-535. DOI: http://doi.org/10.36311/jhgd.v34.16785Links ]

65 Santos LS, Souza E, Guerra MRS, Souza OF, Oliveira FR, Bachur CAK, Bachur JA. Epidemiological profile of gestational syphilis in brazil from 2019 to 2023. J Hum Growth Dev. 2024; 34(3):536-545. DOI: http://doi.org/10.36311/jhgd.v34.16850Links ]

Received: November 01, 2024; Accepted: November 01, 2024; Published: November 01, 2024

Corresponding author tamiresvieiraalim@gmail.com

Conflict of interest

The authors did not receive any funding for writing this editorial and do not have any conflict of interest to declare.

Creative Commons License this article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.