SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.19 issue2The technologization of death: philosophy, science and poetryFamily and maturity: from the lap to the democracy author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Natureza humana

Print version ISSN 1517-2430

Abstract

NAVIA, Ricardo. Remarks on the epistemological statute of Psychoanalysis and of psychoanalytic research. Nat. hum. [online]. 2017, vol.19, n.2, pp. 134-143. ISSN 1517-2430.

This work was motivated by a certain debate in face of the use of the expression "research in psychoanalysis" to designate - almost exclusively - the extra-clinical empirical studies on the process or results of psychoanalytic treatments. I believe that, to the extent that these studies are carried out from outside the clinical-analytical framework and based on categories that are also often non-analytical, they should be called "research on psychoanalysis". It seems clear that, as in any autonomous discipline, the denomination "research in psychoanalysis" should be reserved for the investigations that are carried out from the theory, the framing, the methodology and the proper categories of the discipline; that is, for clinical or theoretical investigations typically psychoanalytic. I intend here to claim the thickness, the specificity and the epistemological consistency of this investigation.

Keywords : epistemology of psychoanalysis; clinical psychoanalytic research; empirical research.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License