Resumo

CALADO, Paula  e  OLIVEIRA, Cícero. What subject do we listen to?: From the subjective structure to the well-meaning clinic. Stylus (Rio J.) [online]. 2019, n.38, pp. 73-86. ISSN 1676-157X.

The effectiveness of the psychoanalytic work and the functioning of a clinical device guided by psychoanalysis are based on a listening process that guides the treatment. The emergence of psychoanalysis implies decentralization. The division between Me and It is clear in Freud's work, especially with the concept of Spaltung, division, split. Lacan, in his reading of the Freudian work, proposes a vast theoretical construction that deals with conceptualizing the subject for psychoanalysis. The subject, like the remainder of a division, like scansion, marked by language, is translated as barred S (by the signifier). The notion of barred S is used for years by Lacan, until a certain moment of his theoretical elaboration, when the notion of parlêtre enters the scene, to account for a subject who has a body. The corporal dimension was not present in the first Lacanian teaching and the parlêtre expresses the subject furthest removed from the notion of signifier and closer to the letter of the unconscious. The question that arises is whether the conceptual change of barred S to the parlêtre brings about a change in the clinical listening and the act of the psychoanalyst. In addition, we argue that the theoretical study and understanding of Lacan's two moments in the subject helps us to think of a more ethical clinic and to foster a desire perceived of the letter.

Palavras-chave : Psychoanalysis; Subject; Barred S; Parlêtre.

        · resumo em Português | Espanhol | Francês     · texto em Português | Francês     · Português ( pdf )