SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número39La elección de SofiaPosibilidad de psicoanálisis en la atención psicológica de emergencia: un lugar de rectificación subjetiva índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Stylus (Rio de Janeiro)

versión impresa ISSN 1676-157X

Resumen

FARIA, Juliana Sperandio. The out-body: impasses between holophrase and letter. Stylus (Rio J.) [online]. 2019, n.39, pp. 135-146. ISSN 1676-157X.

The differences between the psychosomatic phenomenon and the symptom are clarified in the psychoanalysis clinic by the holophrase concept, as Lacan presented during his 11th Seminar. However, the holophrase was already an announcement of a symbolic rupture, given that it appears as a real signifier, or as an S1 out of the chain. This is the reason why we can call a holophrase an out-body referring to the "symbolic body". The real problem was established in the decade of 1970, when Lacan defines the symptom as a letter, a mark of the One, which is out-body. Thus, the question is: holophrase, is that a letter? What kind of "body" was Lacan talking about? The development in the Lacanian theory related to the concepts of the body, the unconscious and the symptom imply a study about what the effects in the body between those two are.

Palabras clave : Letter; Holophrase; Symptom; Body; Unconscious.

        · resumen en Español | Portugués | Francés     · texto en Portugués     · Portugués ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License