SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.2 número1-2Sistemas lógicos e sistemas de significação na obra de Jean PiagetLenguaje, sistemas de significación y pensamiento formal en adolescentes sordos: el lenguaje revestido de operación índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Psicologia USP

versão On-line ISSN 1678-5177

Resumo

HEGENBERG, Leonidas. Logic and Piaget's theory: the significant implication. Psicol. USP [online]. 1991, vol.2, n.1-2, pp. 25-32. ISSN 1678-5177.

"Implication" has, as a very important referent, some deductive situation. In other word, we may say that "P1, P2, ..., Pn imply C" whenever C is a conclusion that follows from the premisses Pi (i = 1, 2, ...,n). Implication, in such cases (and in similar inferential situations), admits reading with the help of "If .... then.,.". Very often, the same locution is used to read the expression "p ? q", constructed with the horseshoe of prepositional calculus (the "philonical juntor", as we may call it, homage to Philon, of Megara). It's not unusual to associate this horseshoe with some type of dedution - a serious mistake, if it is used as a simple operator from the calculus. Besides, the "If,.., then..." has a relevant role in explanations (including causal ones). Identifying the various forms of use of the expression "If..., then..." we come to an appropriate characterization of the meaning to give to the term 'significant implication', as it was considered by Jean Piaget. At the same time, sugestion is made as for the way of understanding the "operations-causality" dichotomy.

Palavras-chave : Logic; Jean Piaget; Significant implicatiom.

        · resumo em Português     · texto em Português     · Português ( pdf )