Abstract

FRANCA, Sonia Aparecida Moreira. Conversations. Rev. Psicol. UNESP [online]. 2013, vol.12, n.1, pp. 36-50. ISSN 1984-9044.

In this essay, we conducted a critical reading of two classic texts of psychological literature. The texts of Maria Luiza Siquier O’campo and Maria Esther Garcia Arzeno, which are in the book The psychodiagnostic process and projective techniques(1981). For these authors, interviews are a relational field. So, the way it is done depends on how you perform the forces of decoding of the meeting, therefore, its realization depends on how psychological knowledge is offered. However, we observed that the conceptual field exposed by these authors, sometimes is inside the Freudian hypothesis, and sometimes in the theory of the subject of consciousness. After all, what concept of human is permeating the theoretical propositions focused by these authors and practices resulting from them? From the reading of the text of Gilles Deleuze, Una entrevista, qué es? Para qué sirve? - first chapter of his book Dialogues with Claire Parnet (1977), we see that the art of building a problem can last a lifetime and usually in an interview, we often do not have this opportunity. A critical reading of these classics based on the philosophy of difference, allows us to conclude that a conversation is a field of experimentation endowed with murmurs, is a timeline to give thought to a current of fresh air for those who never thought they could be. In this sense, the classical models of psychological interviews, guided by scripts, add little to the understanding of emotions in a dialogical sense, but, besides, does nothing but invent the object it wants to diagnose, trapping it in the interviewer’s own meaning.

        · abstract in Portuguese     · text in Portuguese     · Portuguese ( pdf )