SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.7 issue2Minor knowledge and academic profanation: the senses of experience author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Revista Polis e Psique

On-line version ISSN 2238-152X

Abstract

SILVA, Thais Amorim et al. WritingWITH: with whom? with what? For what?. Rev. Polis Psique [online]. 2017, vol.7, n.2, pp. 176-190. ISSN 2238-152X.

This paper problematizes academic writing by arguing that writing is an inherent part of research. Based on considerations of  Haraway (2008, 1995) it affirms that writing is a situated and marked practice. The work bets on doingWITH as the ethical and epistemological direction of the research and presents a discussion about the sharing of written field diaries, between researchers and researched. The text concludes by pointing out that the shared writing of the field diaries opens up new possibilities in the construction of narratives about disability, less as deficits and more as a reinvention of life.

Keywords : Academic Writing; ResearchWITH; Visual Disability; Narratives.

        · abstract in Portuguese | Spanish     · text in Portuguese     · Portuguese ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License