RESEARCH NOTES

 

Estudio preliminar del impacto socioeconómico sobre los puntajes de una batería multidimensional de aptitudes en niños preescolares

 

A preliminary study on the socioeconomic impact on the scores of a set of multidimensional aptitude tests in pre-school children

 

 

César Merino Soto^*; Paola Muñoz Valera^**

^* Licenciado en Psicología. Profesor universitario e investigador de la Universidad San Juan Bautista y de la Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal. Calle Enrique Palacios 430, Chorrillos - Lima 9, Perú. E-Mail: sikayax@yahoo.com.ar
^** Licenciada en Psicología. Investigadora independiente en actividades orientadas a la Psicología Clínica y Educativa.

 

 

---

RESUMEN

El presente estudio explora las relaciones entre nivel socioeconómico, género y tipo de centro educativo preescolar y el desempeño cognitivo de niños preescolares (N = 323) de Lima (Perú), con una prueba multidimensional de aptitudes. Con la aplicación de la técnica multivariada de análisis de perfiles se hallaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas y de moderada magnitud del efecto en los puntajes cognitivos, debidas a la ubicación del centro educativo; no se detectaron diferencias que se atribuyan al género y al tipo de centro. Se trabajó en base a tres hipótesis: La primera es la hipótesis de igualdad de niveles, en la que se examinan las diferencias que en promedio existen entre los dos grupos. La segunda es la hipótesis de igualdad de la dispersión, que examina si las variables de respuesta (puntajes en las subescalas) tienen la misma respuesta en promedio. Y la tercera, la hipótesis de paralelismo, que prueba si el patrón de elevaciones en el perfil es similar entre los dos grupos. Los resultados fueron evaluados con respecto a la consistencia interna y a la definición del nivel socioeconómico (ubicación geográfica). Se discuten las diferencias halladas en el aspecto socioeconómico y relacionándolas con la bibliografía sobre el tema y la utilidad de la batería multidimensional de aptitudes para niños preescolares. Es importante destacar que el estudio reporta información normativa acerca del desempeño de los niños preescolares, en lo que respecta al género y ubicación de los centros educativos y su carácter correlacional y la magnitud del efecto de los resultados.

Palabras clave: Análisis de perfiles - Preescolar - Aptitudes - Nivel socioeconómico - Magnitud del efecto.

---

ABSTRACT

The present study explores the relationship between socioeconomic level, gender and type of pre-school education center, and cognitive development in 323 pre-schoolers in Lima (Perú), using a multidimensional aptitude test. By applying the multivariate technique, we found statistical significant differences and medium size effects on the cognitive scores due to the educational center location, whereas gender and type of educational center differences were not found. The results were considered taking into account reliability levels and also according to the definition of socioeconomic levels. The differences found are discussed based on other articles as well as on the usefulness of the multidimensional aptitude tests for pre-schoolers. The sample consisted of 323 children of 5 years old, 167 boys and 156 girls, who go to both private and public pre-schools in a district of Lima. The proportion of public pre-school students (67.2%) was double the amount of private pre-school students (32.8%). Moreover, the private pre-schools had been recently formed (4 to 5 years before) and had children from families with a medium or medium to low socioeconomic level. In order to assess general and relevant aspects of pre-school learning, we applied a pre-school diagnostic test (De la Cruz, 1991), which can be used at a pre-school level (4-5 year-olds). This test contains the following areas: Verbal concepts, Quantitative concepts and Auditive memory, Visual perceptual aptitude and Visual-motor coordination. It is a potentia test because the time varies from one student to another so as to allow every child to answer every item. Furthermore, it is also a maximum performance test because the student tries to obtain the best possible score. We contacted several educational centers (private and public) from three different districts in Lima which accepted to participate in this study. The time of application of the test varied considering: individual skills, the number of children in the collective application, the presence of a teacher’s aide for the collective application, and the attitude and motivation of the students. We used MANOVA to analyze profiles, a post hoc univariate contrast, and effect size estimations such as Cohen’s d. Our study was based on three hypotheses: The first hypothesis was on the equality of levels (variability between subjects) that explores the differences that exist between both groups separately. As a result, we found no correlation between test performance and gender or school location. However, when considering type of school (public or private), we did find significant differences in one scale: Auditive memory, which was higher in public schools. The second hypothesis was the equality of dispersion (within-group differences), to identify if the answer variables have the same answers on average. We found similarities regarding school conditions (public or private); but there were small differences between gender and school location. The third hypothesis was regarding parallelism, which tests whether the pattern of elevations on the profile is similar between the two groups or not. We did not find important statistical dispersions and the effect size was small. The results coincide with other studies on the correlation between gender and socioeconomic level, and cognitive development. Among some of the limitations of our study, we list the following: for example, we used the school location to determine the children’s socioeconomic level. Therefore, there were also extreme scores (outliers), which could vary the central tendency estimations and the dispersion. However, they were not trimmed, since in a previous unreported analysis without these data, researchers found only minimum changes. We also had occasional difficulties in applying the tests, due to the children’s disposition to participate as well as their reaction concerning the test situation, which could have added random error on the results. However, we presume their negative reactivity was reduced because of the playful manner in which the tests were presented. The results of our research shed normative information regarding the performance of preschoolers due to gender and location of their educational centers. It is important to emphasize correlations as well as effect size of the results so as not to reach erroneous conclusions.

Keywords: Profile analysis - Pre-schooler - Aptitudes - Socio­economic level - Effect size.

---

 

 

Texto completo

 

Referencias bibliográficas

1 AERA, APA, NCME. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

2 Ardila, A. & Rosselli, M. (1996). Soft neurological signs in children: A normative study. Developmental Neuropsychology, 12, 179-198.        [ Links ]

3 Baker, P.C., Keck, C.K., Mott, F.L. & Quinlan, S.V. (1993). NLSY child handbook, revised edition: A guide to the 1986 - 1990 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. Columbus, Ohio: Center for Human Resource Research. Ohio State University.        [ Links ]

4 Bobko, P., Roth, P.L. & Bobko, C. (2001). Correcting the effect size of d for range restriction and unreliability. Organizational Research Methods, 4(1), 46-61.        [ Links ]

5 Bravo, V.L. (1993). Diferencias cognitivas o retardo mental en niños latinoamericanos de nivel socioeconómico bajo (Serie Niñez - Familia - Discapacidad No. 3) [Cognitive differences or mental retard in Latin American low socioeconomic level (Serie Childhood - Family - Disability No. 3)]. Montevideo: Instituto Interamericano del Niño.        [ Links ]

6 Campbell, D.T. & Stanley, J.C. (1966). Diseños experimentales y cuasi-experimentales para investigación [Experimental and quasiexperimental designs for research]. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.        [ Links ]

7 Chase-Landsdale, P.L., Wakschlag, L.S. & Brooks-Gunn, J. (1995). A psychological perspective on the development of caring in children and youth: The role of the family. Journal of Adolescents, 18, 515-556.        [ Links ]

8 Coddou, C. (2003). Pobreza genera déficit en el lenguaje [Poverty generates deficit in the language]. Boletín Informativo de la Facultad de Medicina, Mayo, Universidad de Chile. Recuperado el 26 de julio de 2005 de http://www.med.uchile.cl/noticias/archivo/2003/mayo/fono_snfdo.html        [ Links ]

9 Coe, R. & Merino, C. (2003). Magnitud del efecto: Una guía para investigadores y usuarios [Effect size: A guide for researchers and users]. Revista de Psicología - PUCP, 21(1), 147-177.        [ Links ]

10 Cohen, B.H. (2001). Explaining psychological statistics, (2da. ed.). NY: Wiley.        [ Links ]

11 Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159.        [ Links ]

12 Cratty, B.J. (1982). Desarrollo perceptual y motor en los niños [Perceptual and motor development in children]. Barcelona: Paidós Ibérica.        [ Links ]

13 Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.        [ Links ]

14 De la Cruz, V. (1991). Pruebas de Diagnóstico Preescolar [Preschool diagnostic tests], (3ra. ed.). Barcelona: Tea.

15 Espy, K.A., Molfese, V.J. & DiLalla, L.F. (2001). Effects of environmental measures on intelligence in young children: Growth curve modeling of longitudinal data. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 47(1), 42-73.        [ Links ]

16 Estefanía, M.T. & Tarazona, D. (2003). Psicología y pobreza: ¿Hay algo psicológico en la pobreza o es la pobreza algo psicológico? [Psychology and poverty: Is there something psychological in the poverty or is there somewhat psychological poverty?]. Explorando Psicología, 12, 21-25.         [ Links ]

17 Hurlock, E.B. (1982). Desarrollo del niño [Child development], (2da ed.). México, DF: McGraw-Hill.        [ Links ]

18 Jadue, G. (1997). Factores ambientales que afectan el rendimiento escolar de los niños provenientes de familias de bajo nivel socioeconómico y cultural [Environmental factors affecting the school performance in children from low-level socioeconomic and cultural families]. Estudios Pedagógicos, 23, 75-80.        [ Links ]

19 Johnson, A.J. & Wichern, D.W. (1998). Applied multivariate statistical analysis. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.        [ Links ]

20 Lyytinen, P., Laakso, M.L. & Poikkeus, A.M. (1998). Parental contribution to child’s early language and interest in books. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 13(3), 297-308.

21 Maccoby, E.E. (1998). The two sexes: Growing up apart, coming together. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

22 Macklem, G.L. (1990). Measuring aptitude. Washington, DC: TM Digest.        [ Links ]

23 Majluf, A. (1986). Diferencias de clases socioeconómicas y de sexo en el desarrollo mental y postural de infantes de 8, 14 y 20 meses de edad de Lima [differences of class socioeconomic and of sex in the mental and posture development of 8, 14 and 20 months aged of Li­ma children]. En F.R. León (Ed.), Psicología y realidad peruana: El aporte objetivo (pp. 25-38). Lima: Mosca Azul.        [ Links ]

24 Msall, M.E., Bier, J., LaGasse, L., Tremont, M. & Lester, B. (1998). The vulnerable preschool child: The impact of biomedical and social risk on neurodevelopmental function. Seminars in Pediatric Neurology, 5(1), 52-61.        [ Links ]

25 NICHD Early Child Care Research Network (2000). The relation of child care to cognitive and language development. Child Development, 71(4), 960-980.

26 NICHD Early Child Care Research Network (2003). Do children’s attention processes mediate the link between family predictors and school readiness? Developmental Psychology, 39(3), 581-593.

27 NICHD Early Child Care Research Network & Duncan, G. (2003). Modeling the impacts of child care quality on children’s preschool cognitive development. Child Development, 74(5), 1454-1475.

28 Nunnally, J.C. & Bernstein, I.J. (1995). Teoría psicométrica [Psychometric theory], (3ra. ed.). México, DF: McGraw-Hill.        [ Links ]

29 Oliva, M., Mathisen, M. & Pandolfi, A. (2000). Variación en la competencia léxica del preescolar: Algunos factores asociados [Variation in the lexical competence of the preschool students: Some associated factors]. Estudios Filológicos, 35, 61-70.        [ Links ]

30 Reese, H.W. & Lipsitt, L.P. (1980). Psicología experimental infantil [Experimental child Psychology]. México, DF: Trillas.        [ Links ]

31 Riple, C.H., Gilliam, W.S., Chanuna, N. & Ziegler, E. (1999). Will fifty cooks spoil the broth? The debate over entrusting head start to the States Unites. American Psychologist,54(4), 327-343.        [ Links ]

32 Sameroff, A.J., Barlko, W.T., Baldwin, A., Baldwin, C. & Sufer, R. (1998). Family and risks. En M. Lewis & C. Feiring (Eds.), Families, risk, and competence (pp. 161-185). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.        [ Links ]

33 Sattler, J.M. (1988). Evaluación de la inteligencia infantil y habilidades especiales [Assessment of children’s intelligence and special abilities], (2da ed.). México DF: El Manual Moderno.

34 Schuftan, C., Valenzuela, M., Lopez, V., Zapata, R., Jaque, G., Gattas, V. & Aguayo, M. (1975). Bajo rendimiento escolar: ¿Desnutrición o deprivación cultural? [Low school achievement: Malnutrition or cultural deprivation?]. Archivos Latinoamericanos de Nutrición, 25, 121-134.        [ Links ]

35 Spiel, C., Sirsch, U., Wagner, P. & Busch, M. (1995). Academic achievement, family climate, and parental support-effects of biological risks and socio-economic conditions. Trabajo presentado en el Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development (SRCD). Indianapolis.        [ Links ]

36 Stigler, S. (2005). Correlation and causation: A comment. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 48(1), 88-94.         [ Links ]

37 Tatum, D.S. (1999). Is more better? Measuring the effects of full-day kindergarten. Popular Measurement, 2(1), 24-26.        [ Links ]

38 Terrones, G.A., Solís, M.M., Canudas, G.R. & Díaz, S.D. (1994). Vocabulario y nivel comprensivo en estudiantes con educación pre-escolar y sin dicha experiencia educativa [Vocabulary and comprensive level in preschool students with and without preschool experience]. Revista Latinoamerincana de Psicología, 26(1), 83-95.        [ Links ]

39 Wagner, P., Spiel, C. & Sirsch, U. (Abril, 1996). Task commitment, social behavior, and activity level in young adolescents - Effects of slight biological and socio-economic risks.Trabajo presentado en la XIV Reunión Bienal del ISSBD. Québec, Canadá.

 

Universidad San Juan Bautista - Lima - Perú.

Fecha de recepción: 19 de marzo de 2007
Fecha de aceptación: 11 de julio de 2007